Digital Forensics
Digital Forensics and IT Security Consultancy
Computer Forensics
Forensic Copying
Mobile Evidence
Handset Examinations
Connection Charting
Cell Site Analysis
Cell Site Analysis


 

Cell site analysis is a technique to determine the general geographical location of a mobile telephone at the time of its past connectionsThe geographical landscape of the UK and Ireland is scattered with mobile telephone masts. In simple terms, when a mobile telephone is making/receiving a call or a text message it uses a cell to coordinate the connection. Each cell has a unique number assigned to it known as the Cell ID. It is this unique cell number that the network providers store for each connection a telephone makes and receives on their network.  

The records containing the cell information are known as the Call Data (Detail) Records (CDRs for short).  It is these CDRs that allow cell site analysis to be conducted.
  SRC is able to provide a free overview and advice for your case evidence to determine the best way to progress given your case scenario and advise you how to obtain the required records from the CPS or directly from the network providers.  Contact SRC for provision of this service.


Coverage of Cells

Each cell has a geographical area in which it may be used to make a call or text.  However, the coverage of a cell is determined by many factors including its orientation, the physical landscape surrounding it, if the cell and those surrounding are functioning correctly etc. Additionally, just like how your radio signal sometimes can be intermittent, the received mobile signal from a particular cell in a given location is also variable due to physcial changes in the landscape/local area, changes in the positioning and configuration of cells, weather and network usage. 

Sam Raincock is principal scientist and an expert witness at SRC and has also found large differences in the signal strength provided by a cell depending on whether a mobile telephone is located inside or outside a building including large difference sometimes being noted between rooms inside a building.  Hence, she often conducts her cell site analysis to replicate the scenario including taking readings in all of the rooms of a building, taking the readings at approximately the same time as the past calls and taking the readings for as long as possible to obtain a better indication of the signal strength variability being detected.
 

   

 

What are the limitations?


Cell site analysis is useful in enabling an expert to state that a telephone was travelling over large distances (for example, a telephone moving from the London area to the Manchester area), however, for short distances or static locations things become more variable and uncertain.

When cases involve a telephone being located in a fairly small georgraphical area (in the order of less than 2-5 miles), usually cell site analysis is conducted to answer questions about a particular scenario.  Typically, it will be used to address if a telephone could have been located at the scene of a crime and/or where the defendant states they were located.  In such a situation, an expert is likely to conduct network signal testing of the mobile network at both locations.  It can also determine the coverage of cells which can sometimes turn up surprises.


Instructing SRC in Cell Site Analysis cases

SRC specialises in large and complex cell site analysis cases particularly involving multiple locations, drive testing interpretations (when network readings are obtained via driving around the general area in a vehicle) and cases where the congregation of telephones in certain areas is significant. 

In previous cases, Sam's analysis has resulted in experts revising their statements, provision of joint statements of agreement, evidence being withdrawn and disproving a case scenario via the demonstration of contrary information.   See testimonials for cases in which SRC has previously been instructed.
Sam has recently worked as a cell site analysis expert in a number of high profile cases including:
  • DPP v John O’Brien (murder (acquitted)).  May 2008
  • R v Eusop Milne (murder and attempted murder). June 2008 and retrial July 2009.
  • R v Christopher Morrissey (murder of a sub-postmaster's son).  December 2009.
  • R v Christopher Caunter (murder).  November 2008.
  • DPP v Joseph O'Rielly (murder). Quality validation for initial trial in June 2007 and review of the case for appeal in March 2009.
  • DPP v Gerald Barry (murder of a Swiss national).  March 2009.
  • DPP v Garrett O'Brien (cell site analysis and connection evaluation - murder). June 2011 and retrial in November 2012.
  • R v Ishaq Hussain (cell site analysis - Murder (Acquitted)). December 2011.  http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2077205/Teenage-mother-stabbed-death-thrown-canal-bringing-shame-family.html
  • R v Mohammad Ali – co-defendant in Dale Cregan Trial (cell site analysis & sat nav evidence - assisting an offender). June 2013.
  • R v Sajmir Xhakrosa (telecoms and cell site analysis – conspiracy to supply with others over £4 million of drugs per year).  February 2014.
  • DPP v Stephen Freeman (telecommunications, connection charting and cell site analysis – kidnap and attempted robbery from the Bank of Ireland).  July 2014.  http://www.irishtimes.com/news/crime-and-law/courts/man-jailed-for-eight-years-for-adrian-ronan-kidnapping-1.1880577
  • R v Victor Latali (cell site analysis – kidnap and blackmail).  August 2014.
 

 

 

Sam Raincock ConsultancySam RaincockDigital ForensicsIT SecurityContact